A virtual visit from Health’s Advisory Board resulted in a number of specific recommendations. The shared agenda comprised four items: Internationalisation of the degree programmes, external funding, recruitment and gender equality. But the departments also received other advice along the way.
2020.11.26 |
When Health’s international panel of advisers checked-in at the faculty last week, they did so in accordance with the current dominant meeting trend – on Zoom.
Members of the Advisory Board in seven European different countries were ready to provide inspiration and good advice about the strategic focus areas that are most in focus at the faculty right now.
One important focus area is the internationalisation of the degree programmes. One of the faculty's objectives is to have ten new summer schools in 2021 and to offer mobility scholarships and sabbaticals for teaching staff.
In its recommendations, the board suggested incentives for teaching staff, so that a period working or studying abroad is not only about finances, but also involves prestige. They also pointed towards the possibility of more courses and programmes in English, and an opportunity to invite exchange students into parts of the degree programmes.
However, at the same time there was acknowledgement that language is a challenge for exchanges, as major language areas such as German and French almost exclusively teach in their own language. The Advisory Board therefore agreed that elective courses and summer schools at Master's degree level are the most relevant places to establish a common, international study environment.
There was also broad support for the idea of joint exchange programmes for teaching staff, e.g. in the form of half-yearly sabbaticals or shorter visits of a few weeks, where teaching staff within specific subject areas get the chance to meet and inspire each other. But the message was also that it is important for activities abroad to give credit transfer and help with career-advancement.
In recent years, the faculty has had particular focus on external funding. The Advisory Board’s input for EU proposals included advice about how critical it is to have professional research support and to cultivate both academic and industry partnerships in plenty of time.
New norms for recruitment have long been on the faculty’s agenda, and the challenges when recruiting international employees include the requirement in connection with appointments in the clinical area that the person must be able to communicate in Danish. The Advisory Board also recommended maintaining focus on internal career opportunities.
One solution could be to appoint people solely to teach, which according to several members, is also a widespread practice in the UK.
Finally, gender equality was on the programme. Among the proposals to promote gender equality were focusing on the number of career years rather than age. Although another point was that management should be very clear in formulating expectations, both for the individual and for the workplace culture they wish to see. For example, this may involve not exclusively focusing on results, but also on how to create the results in collaboration with colleagues and contribute to the university's development – also called academic citizenship.
Now is the time to follow up – both in the faculty management team and locally at the departments – on the recommendations from the Advisory Board. At the faculty's annual strategy day on 10 December, the recommendations will be included in the discussions of new initiatives within the faculty's focus areas.
See who the members of the Advisory Board are